Most people agree that we need to reduce carbon gas emissions now for our future generations.
With this in mind, Carbon Capture Utilisation & Storage (CCUS) stands out as an important solution, if we want to keep our standards of living and mitigate climate change impact. More than 60 different CCUS projects are in progress in Europe (Map of global CCUS projects | IOGP Publications library). Worldwide, regulators follow the Paris Accord on climate changes and facilitate CCS financially representing business opportunities for the heavy industry in general and particularly within oil and gas.
So, if we have the solution to achieve lower carbon world, why aren’t we closer to the target already?
There are several challenges to overcome:
While #1 and #2 involve great challenges, #3 has already been tested and is actually widely used already.
A recently launched Norwegian multidisciplinary research effort (180 mNOK LinCCS) aims to solve the CCS challenges and could offer cost efficient solution for the entire carbon capture and storage supply chain. A collaboration between a number of operators, research institutions and service providers aims to meet the expectations of the Paris accord.
A multidisciplinary project is essential, since the challenges are complex, and the number of disciplines are great. In addition, the desire to store clean energy, such as hydrogen, ammonia and natural gas, only adds to the complexity.
Looking into the future, we can expect great demand for CO2 storage offshore. A plethora of saline aquifers commonly associated with oil and gas production are to be found in the North Sea, offering significant CO2 storage capabilities. The challenge is to find the best opportunities for storage in terms of injectivity, capacity, facility and end of field life.
Key drivers for carbon storage are the size of aquifer; and the large depositional systems with significant clastic input that means accumulation of massive sands. Such reservoirs have yielded long term production of oil and gas and are in some fields at the end of production life, offering safe storage in the vicinity of significant infrastructure, such as pipelines and huge GBS platforms, that can serve for many years to come.
In the North Sea, there are three massive depositional systems representing different ages of deposition and containing many fields at different stages of depletion. These are:
Each drilled structure reveals a find or not, and with a nearly complete coverage of 3D seismic across the North Sea, this means that there is a very good control of saline aquifer reservoirs. The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) has mapped and published "CO2 Atlas" where depositional clastic sequences, which could qualify as CO2 storage.
Equinor together with Shell and TotalEnergies is operating the first CO2 transport and storage facility incorporating the Johansen Fm saline aquifer.
The Northern Lights is a costly project and heavily subsidised and without reuse of oil and gas facilities. The re-use of facilities may provide more cost-effective solutions. In Denmark, Ineos is working on CO2 storage in the Nini West field, which is at the final tail end of production, however without a final investment decision to date.
Increased recovery has been a measure of economic success throughout the history of oil and gas, and vast efforts have been put into different methods. Pressure support, water and gas injection, extended reach wells and horizontal wells, have all increased recovery from 30% in the 1950’s to 60% in recent years. Since the 1970’s CO2 has been used for displacing oil to increase recovery in the US, with CO2 at reservoir conditions having similar fluid density as oil, and in certain conditions becoming miscible, therefore making it ideal for displacing the oil.
An economic game changer can be found if we allow Improved Oil Recovery (IOR) as a part of the CO2 storage project. The use of CO2 for displacing oil will increase recovery by 7% as a rule, representing a very good economic return.
Politically, however, this is a big IF. The purpose of CO2 storage is to mitigate CO2 emissions from oil & gas. On the other hand, the tail production in oil and gas fields usually means that CO2 emission expressed as kg/bbl increases as production decreases. Frankly tail production, with very high emissions per barrel, should be avoided to improve energy efficiency and limit CO2 emissions.
Norwegian Petroleum Directorate and Operators on the Norwegian Continental Shelf have been very successful in increased recovery, gaining record breaking results - positive when considering resource utilisation where an IOR price is presented to the best company every year. However, maybe this should be reconsidered when 95% or more is water coming out of the production wells – something which is common. Using CO2 which to a large extent will remain stored in the reservoir may be a better choice, and at the same time the infrastructure for CO2 storage can also be established.
To conclude, we see great opportunities for profitable CCUS, combining existing infrastructure in areas of extensive oil and gas production, where huge saline aquifers are located and opportunities exist for CO2 injection as an IOR technique.
Read the latest issue of the OGV Energy magazine HERE